However, only searching Google Scholar means missing important research and spending. Searching in Google Scholar is imprecise when compared with discipline-specific databases. Search results can include PowerPoints, news announcements or unpublished materials as well as articles and books. Google Scholar searches academic websites (.edu) as well as journals and publisher websites. Caution should be exercised when relying on GS for citations and metrics mainly because it can be easily manipulated and its indexing quality still remains a challenge. Google Scholar can be a great tool for supplementing your research. Not everything in Google Scholar is scholarly. However, the quality of resources indexed and overall policy still remains known. Enter your email address, and click 'Create alert'. Our results show that GS has significantly expanded its coverage through the years which makes it a powerful database of scholarly literature. Click the envelope icon in the sidebar of the search results page.
#GOOGLE SCHOLAR DATABASE FREE#
We reviewed 91 comparative articles from 2005 until 2016 which compared GS to various databases and especially Web of Science (WOS) and Scopus in an effort to determine whether GS can be used as a suitable source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation. Google Scholar is a free service that provides a simple way to broadly search for scholarly works and to connect patrons with the resources libraries. Google Scholar allows users to search for a find a wide variety of materials including articles, books, 'grey literature' like conference proceedings on a vast number of topics. In this article we aimed to review some studies in these areas in an effort to provide insights into GS ability to replace controlled databases in various subject areas. Advantages of using Google Scholar: Google Scholar is familiar and relatively simple to use, much like Google. In addition, GS introduction of citations tracking and journal metrics have spurred a body of literature focusing on its ability to produce reliable metrics. These studies focus on its coverage, quality and ability to replace controlled databases as a source of reliable scientific literature. Studies comparing GS to controlled databases such as Scopus, Web of Science (WOS) and others have been published almost since GS inception. As Google Scholar (GS) gains more ground as free scholarly literature retrieval source it’s becoming important to understand its quality and reliability in terms of scope and content.
0 kommentar(er)
